Request a Pilot
‹ PublicAI Index

The LLM benchmark aggregator.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek · 763B · open weights

Strongest in Factual grounding (#6 of 104), weakest in Mathematics (#73 of 152). Above par in 32 of 35 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Fable 5 and ahead of GPT-5.6 Terra and Grok 4.7.

§ 1 · Profile

What it is good at

Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.

Coding61.4#7/179
Agentic coding61.9#7/173
Code generation62.4—/20✱
Repository Q&A53.7—/0✱
Human preference63.9#32/354
Human preference63.9#32/354
Agents56.9#38/298
Knowledge work66.8#11/208
Long-horizon work50.8#13/31
Web research50.1#23/35
Computer use53.3#30/68
Workflow automation66—/0✱
Reasoning55.6#38/195
Reasoning58.5#28/147
Mathematics52.6#73/152
Science46.4—/122✱
Expert reasoning64.3—/0✱
Core abilities54.8#47/199
Data analysis57.8#10/31
Language54.1#26/62
Instruction following53.6#29/62
General intelligence54.2#55/178
Knowledge53.9#47/197
Document parsing54.2#37/83
Multimodal understanding50.8—/19✱
Professional53.5#53/194
Document design60.5#6/31
Cybersecurity57.9#10/47
Biology research47.3#19/31
IT operations39.6#29/33
Legal56.1#32/173
Finance55.9#37/162
Medical52.5#70/149
Safety54.6#59/329
Factual grounding64.6#6/104

§ 2 · Head to head

What it beats, and what beats it

The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, left for the other.

DeepSeek V4 Flashwon 21 · lost 0
Step 5won 21 · lost 0
Gemma 4 31Bwon 22 · lost 0
Mistral Large 4won 23 · lost 1
Inklingwon 23 · lost 2
Qwen3.8 27Bwon 22 · lost 3
DeepSeek V4 Prowon 19 · lost 3
GPT-5.4 nanowon 18 · lost 3
GPT-6 Lunawon 24 · lost 4
GLM-5.3 Flashwon 21 · lost 5
Qwen3.8 Maxwon 20 · lost 5
MiniMax M3won 16 · lost 5
GPT-5.6 Lunawon 17 · lost 6
Claude Sonnet 5won 15 · lost 6
Grok 4.5won 14 · lost 7
Claude Haiku 5.5won 16 · lost 11
Grok 4.6won 15 · lost 11
Gemini 3.6 Flashwon 12 · lost 9
Gemini 3.8 Flashwon 16 · lost 12
MiMo V2.6 Prowon 13 · lost 10
Grok 4.7won 14 · lost 12
GPT-5.6 Terrawon 14 · lost 13
Kimi K3won 12 · lost 13
GPT-6 Solwon 11 · lost 12
Gemini 3.1 Prowon 10 · lost 11
GPT-5.4won 9 · lost 12
Claude Opus 4.7won 9 · lost 12
Muse Spark 1.3won 8 · lost 15
Muse Wonderwon 7 · lost 16
Claude Sonnet 5.5won 8 · lost 19
GPT-6 Astrawon 8 · lost 21
GPT-6.1 Solwon 7 · lost 20
GPT-5.5won 5 · lost 17
GPT-5.6 Solwon 5 · lost 20
Gemini 4 Argonwon 4 · lost 21
Claude Opus 5.5won 4 · lost 25
Claude Opus 5won 3 · lost 19
Claude Fable 5won 1 · lost 20
Claude Fable 5.1won 1 · lost 25

§ 3 · Sources

Where the numbers come from

12 publications, 59 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.

LMArena Text ↗1 measureread 2026-11-10
LMArena Text 1475
Artificial Analysis ↗1 measureread 2026-11-10
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 33
GDPval-AA ↗1 measureread 2026-11-10
GDPval-AA 1746
AA-Briefcase ↗1 measureread 2026-11-10
AA-Briefcase 1570
ARC-AGI-2 ↗1 measureread 2026-11-10
ARC-AGI-2 78.1%
LiveBench ↗8 measuresread 2026-11-10
LiveBench 70.3LiveBench · Agentic 38.8LiveBench · Reasoning 89.1LiveBench · Coding 80.4LiveBench · Browser Use 67.2LiveBench · Data Analysis 79.5LiveBench · Research 78.6LiveBench · Design 79.8
LiveBench 1.0 ↗8 measuresread 2026-11-10
LiveBench 1.0 81.1LiveBench 1.0 · Reasoning 86.7LiveBench 1.0 · Coding 80LiveBench 1.0 · Agentic Coding 77.3LiveBench 1.0 · Mathematics 93.3LiveBench 1.0 · Data Analysis 79.3LiveBench 1.0 · Language 81.2LiveBench 1.0 · Instruction Following 70
SimpleBench ↗1 measureread 2026-11-10
SimpleBench 66.7%
Vals.ai ↗12 measuresread 2026-11-10
Vals · Legal Research Bench 45.19%Vals · LegalBench 83.28%Vals · Harvey Legal Agent Benchmark 14.17%Vals · Finance Agent 56.96%Vals · MedCode 41.17%Vals · MedScribe 85.5%Vals · BioMysteryBench 67.78%Vals · CyberBench 73.69%Vals · SRE Bench 0.76%Vals · Vibe Code Bench 87.73% (OpenHands)Vals · Code Migration 44.21%Vals · ProofBench 54%
ParseBench ↗6 measuresread 2026-11-10
ParseBench · Overall 64.38%ParseBench · Tables 82.84%ParseBench · Charts 51.11%ParseBench · Content faithfulness 86.92%ParseBench · Semantic formatting 73.48%ParseBench · Visual grounding 27.53%
Vectara · Factual consistency 95.8%
GPQA Diamond (Pass@1) 90.9%Codeforces (Rating) 3471MathArena Apex (Pass@1) 65.6%Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Pass@1) 90.6%Terminal-Bench 3.0 (Pass@1) 30%Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Pass@1) 31.2%DeepSWE v1.1 (Resolved) 74.2%ProgramBench (Almost@1) 20.3%NL2Repo-Bench (Score) 64%CyberGym (Pass@1) 88.1%SEC-Bench Pro (Pass@1) 62.8%ExploitGym (Pass@1) 15.3%HLE w/ tools (Pass@1) 63.9%AutomationBench (Pass@1) 54.8%Agent's Last Exam (Pass@1) 31.8%Chartography w/ tools (Pass@1) 78.9%BabyVision w/ tools (Pass@1) 89.6%ZeroBench-main w/ tools (Pass@5) 49%

Badge

PublicAI Index badge for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash[![PublicAI Index](https://publicai.io/model-index/badge?model=deepseek-v4-1-flash)](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/deepseek-v4-1-flash)

✱ Placed by a one-off publication, not a board that re-ran the model. ✱✱ marks a figure the model’s own publisher printed, which counts for less again. Scores are 0–100 on the PublicAI Index scale, 50 = the average of the models each source lists. Scores belong to their publishers.

Snapshot 2026-11-10 · the full index · JSON API