The LLM benchmark aggregator.
DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek · 1.7T · open weights
Strongest in Agentic coding (#10 of 157, on 2 of its 4 boards), weakest in Toxicity avoidance (#213 of 272). Above par in 25 of 33 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Fable 5 and ahead of Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for DeepSeek V4 Pro, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
12 publications, 51 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/deepseek-v4-pro)