‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Beam 1.0
Reflection
Strongest in Web research (#25 of 48, on 1 of its 2 boards), weakest in Agents (#185 of 289). Above par in 4 of 14 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Fable 5 and GPT-6 Astra and ahead of DeepSeek V3 and GPT-4.1 Mini.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Coding51.8−14.6#69/1761/6
Agentic coding51.9−15.1#64/1691/5
Professional47.9−15.2#119/1871/2
Document design42.1−25#36/471/1
Reasoning46.7−18.1#122/1892/5
Reasoning45.2−21.5#85/1432/3
Core abilities46−19.2#152/2252/4
Data analysis42.4−23.5#36/471/1
General intelligence47−21.8#130/2142/3
Agents46.2−19.7#185/2893/6
Web research51.7−12#25/481/2
Long-horizon work37.1−36.9#39/471/1
Knowledge work54.8−17#60/1982/2
Computer use33.4−34.5#76/801/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Beam 1.0, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
5 publications, 12 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 30
GDPval-AA 1177
AA-Briefcase 976
ARC-AGI-2 23.5%
LiveBench 55.5LiveBench · Agentic 17.3LiveBench · Reasoning 80.2LiveBench · Coding 83.9LiveBench · Browser Use 0LiveBench · Data Analysis 66.4LiveBench · Research 72.8LiveBench · Design 67.9
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/beam-1-0)