‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Amazon Nova 2 Lite
Amazon
Strongest in Factual grounding (#10 of 102), weakest in Agents (#215 of 289). Above par in 4 of 9 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind GPT-5.6 Terra and Claude Sonnet 5 and ahead of Gemini 2.5 Pro and DeepSeek R1.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety53.9−7.5#72/3311/3
Factual grounding62.4−8.4#10/1021/1
Knowledge38−24.7#184/1911/3
Document parsing37.2−26.4#70/771/1
Human preference50.5−18.1#193/3501/1
Human preference50.5−18.1#193/3501/1
Agents44.8−21.1#215/2892/6
Tool use42.2−31.8#57/811/1
Knowledge work42.7−29.1#128/1981/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Amazon Nova 2 Lite, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
5 publications, 10 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1335
GDPval-AA 366
BFCL v4 27.1%
ParseBench · Overall 40.43%ParseBench · Tables 68.38%ParseBench · Charts 6.7%ParseBench · Content faithfulness 77.04%ParseBench · Semantic formatting 45.26%ParseBench · Visual grounding 4.78%
Vectara · Factual consistency 94.9%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/amazon-nova-2-lite)