‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Amazon Nova Micro
Amazon
Strongest in Factual grounding (#18 of 104), weakest in Human preference (#267 of 354). Above par in 6 of 11 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Phi 4 and Claude Opus 4.8 and ahead of Grok 4.1 Fast and GLM-4.6.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety53.6−7.8#80/3292/3
Factual grounding61.3−9.4#18/1041/1
Harm refusal54.5−7#77/2921/2
Jailbreak resistance56.7−8.3#88/2681/1
Toxicity avoidance54.6−4.4#117/2681/1
Secure code51.6−14.6#136/2701/1
Fairness44−26#212/2921/2
Agents45.3−21.1#214/2981/6
Tool use38.7−35.3#68/811/1
Human preference41.4−27.4#267/3541/1
Human preference41.4−27.4#267/3541/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Amazon Nova Micro, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
4 publications, 9 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1241
BFCL v4 22.29%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 7.2%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 20.6%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 9.7%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 3%Enkrypt · Bias risk 87.1%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 29.8%
Vectara · Factual consistency 94.5%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/amazon-nova-micro)