‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Llama 3 70B Instruct
Meta · 70B
Strongest in Toxicity avoidance (#2 of 272), weakest in Human preference (#239 of 342). Above par in 6 of 11 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and GPT-5 and ahead of Grok 4 and GPT-4.1 Nano.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety52.4−9.1#116/3372/3
Toxicity avoidance59leads#2/2721/1
Safe-prompt compliance55.9−4.5#29/821/1
Jailbreak resistance59.8−5.1#51/2721/1
Fairness50.1−19.9#114/3002/2
Harm refusal51.7−9.9#130/3002/2
Secure code44−22.5#200/2741/1
Core abilities44−23.4#161/2041/3
General intelligence41.4−28.7#164/2041/3
Human preference45.2−22.3#239/3421/1
Human preference45.2−22.3#239/3421/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Llama 3 70B Instruct, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
4 publications, 13 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1277
Kagi LLM Benchmark 35.1%
HELM Safety · HarmBench 64%HELM Safety · SimpleSafetyTests 99%HELM Safety · Anthropic Red Team 96.7%HELM Safety · BBQ 91%HELM Safety · XSTest 96.8%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 4.5%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 12.2%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 13.7%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 0%Enkrypt · Bias risk 80.4%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 45.8%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/llama-3-70b-instruct)