‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Llama 3 70B Instruct
Meta · 70B
Strongest in Toxicity avoidance (#1 of 266), weakest in Human preference (#249 of 354). Above par in 6 of 11 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and GPT-5 and ahead of Grok 4 and Grok 3.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety52.4−9#113/3272/3
Toxicity avoidance59leads#1/2661/1
Safe-prompt compliance55.9−4.5#29/821/1
Jailbreak resistance59.9−5.1#48/2661/1
Fairness50.1−19.9#113/2902/2
Harm refusal51.7−9.8#127/2902/2
Secure code43.8−22.4#197/2681/1
Core abilities44−21.6#156/2001/4
General intelligence41.3−27.7#147/1801/3
Human preference44.9−23.9#249/3541/1
Human preference44.9−23.9#249/3541/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Llama 3 70B Instruct, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
4 publications, 13 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1277
Kagi LLM Benchmark 35.1%
HELM Safety · HarmBench 64%HELM Safety · SimpleSafetyTests 99%HELM Safety · Anthropic Red Team 96.7%HELM Safety · BBQ 91%HELM Safety · XSTest 96.8%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 4.5%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 12.2%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 13.7%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 0%Enkrypt · Bias risk 80.4%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 45.8%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/llama-3-70b-instruct)