‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Granite 3.0 2B Instruct
IBM · 2B
Strongest in Toxicity avoidance (#21 of 268), weakest in Human preference (#311 of 354). Above par in 3 of 8 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude Sonnet 4 and ahead of Command R and MiMo V2.6 Flash.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety49.9−11.5#179/3291/3
Toxicity avoidance58.3−0.7#21/2681/1
Jailbreak resistance54.8−10.2#119/2681/1
Secure code51.4−14.8#140/2701/1
Harm refusal48−13.5#187/2921/2
Fairness41.9−28.1#255/2921/2
Human preference33.3−35.5#311/3541/1
Human preference33.3−35.5#311/3541/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Granite 3.0 2B Instruct, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
2 publications, 7 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1157
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 8.8%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 38.3%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 17.8%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 0.5%Enkrypt · Bias risk 90.4%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 30.2%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/granite-3-0-2b-instruct)