‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Granite 4.0 H Tiny
IBM
Strongest in Toxicity avoidance (#17 of 266), weakest in Secure code (#197 of 268). Above par in 4 of 6 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude 3.5 Sonnet and ahead of Phi-3 Small 8K Instruct and GPT-6 Sol.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety52.4−9#116/3271/3
Toxicity avoidance58.4−0.6#17/2661/1
Harm refusal55.9−5.6#54/2901/2
Jailbreak resistance55.4−9.6#111/2661/1
Fairness45.4−24.6#181/2901/2
Secure code43.8−22.4#197/2681/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Granite 4.0 H Tiny, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
1 publication, 6 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 8.3%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 8.3%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 12.7%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 0.4%Enkrypt · Bias risk 85%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 45.8%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/granite-4-0-h-tiny)