‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Jamba 1.6 Large
AI21
Strongest in Legal (#103 of 151), weakest in Safety (#235 of 337). Above par in 1 of 15 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 4.8 and Grok 4.6 and ahead of Jamba 1.5 Large and Command R Plus.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Knowledge30−33.5#136/1381/2
Academic knowledge26−37.9#121/1231/1
Professional39.3−22.3#158/1681/1
Legal45.2−21.9#103/1511/1
Medical32.9−33.9#134/1401/1
Finance36.4−26.5#139/1511/1
Reasoning33.6−33.3#176/1781/4
Science26.1−37.4#120/1221/1
Mathematics32.9−32.8#136/1401/2
Safety47.9−13.6#235/3371/3
Jailbreak resistance52−12.9#158/2721/1
Fairness46.2−23.8#166/3001/2
Harm refusal47.7−13.9#196/3001/2
Secure code44.4−22.1#197/2741/1
Toxicity avoidance49.1−9.9#207/2721/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Jamba 1.6 Large, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
2 publications, 13 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Vals · LegalBench 71.96%Vals · CorpFin 41.53%Vals · TaxEval 60.88%Vals · MedQA 50.7%Vals · GPQA Diamond 36.11%Vals · MMLU Pro 49.78%Vals · AIME 0.42%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 11.1%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 50.6%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 11.7%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 6.9%Enkrypt · Bias risk 83.7%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 44.9%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/jamba-1-6-large)