‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Qwen3 Max
Alibaba
Strongest in Finance (#26 of 162), weakest in Coding (#152 of 179). Above par in 10 of 15 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Fable 5 and Claude Fable 5.1 and ahead of GPT-6 Luna and Grok 4.1 Fast.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Core abilities56.7−8.6#32/1991/4
General intelligence59.7−9.7#29/1781/3
Reasoning54−11.4#57/1951/5
Science56.1−7.4#50/1221/1
Mathematics53.9−9.9#65/1521/2
Knowledge52−10.5#86/1971/3
Academic knowledge54.7−9.2#58/1231/1
Professional49.7−12.7#100/1941/2
Finance57.3−5.1#26/1621/1
Legal49−16.9#98/1731/1
Medical44.1−22.4#123/1491/1
Human preference58.9−9.9#106/3541/1
Human preference58.9−9.9#106/3541/1
Coding42.2−24#152/1791/6
Agentic coding41.4−25.5#151/1731/5
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Qwen3 Max, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
3 publications, 13 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1423
Kagi LLM Benchmark 72.5%
Vals · CaseLaw 54.98%Vals · LegalBench 81.86%Vals · CorpFin 68.03%Vals · TaxEval 73.51%Vals · MedQA 87.37%Vals · MedCode 31.37%Vals · MedScribe 72.71%Vals · Vibe Code Bench 3.51% (OpenHands)Vals · GPQA Diamond 84.85%Vals · MMLU Pro 84.98%Vals · AIME 81.04%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/qwen3-max)