‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
DeepSeek V4
DeepSeek
Strongest in Science (#30 of 122), weakest in Mathematics (#125 of 152). Above par in 4 of 11 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 5 and Claude Fable 5.1 and ahead of Kimi K2 and Claude Sonnet 4.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Knowledge53.1−9.4#60/1971/3
Academic knowledge57.5−6.4#32/1231/1
Coding49.8−16.4#88/1791/6
Agentic coding49.8−17.1#86/1731/5
Professional49.3−13.1#106/1941/2
Finance51.1−11.3#90/1621/1
Legal48.8−17.1#101/1731/1
Medical47.2−19.3#102/1491/1
Reasoning47.6−17.8#118/1951/5
Science59.3−4.2#30/1221/1
Mathematics38.3−25.5#125/1521/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for DeepSeek V4, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
1 publication, 14 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Vals · Legal Research Bench 23.08%Vals · CaseLaw 59.38%Vals · LegalBench 80.32%Vals · Finance Agent 44.08%Vals · CorpFin 61.38%Vals · TaxEval 72.08%Vals · MedCode 40.45%Vals · MedScribe 75.14%Vals · SWE-bench Verified 77.4% (Mini-SWE-agent)Vals · Vibe Code Bench 49.93% (OpenHands)Vals · Code Migration 26.2%Vals · GPQA Diamond 89.39%Vals · MMLU Pro 87.25%Vals · ProofBench 16%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/deepseek-v4)