‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Jamba 1.5 Mini
AI21
Strongest in Secure code (#46 of 270), weakest in Human preference (#268 of 354). Above par in 2 of 12 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Opus 5 and ahead of Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct and GPT-3.5 Turbo.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Professional36.6−25.8#191/1941/2
Medical34.9−31.6#138/1491/1
Legal41.1−24.8#148/1731/1
Finance30−32.4#160/1621/1
Safety47.2−14.2#245/3291/3
Secure code61.9−4.3#46/2701/1
Jailbreak resistance50.3−14.7#175/2681/1
Fairness43.5−26.5#227/2921/2
Toxicity avoidance39.2−19.8#241/2681/1
Harm refusal44.7−16.8#247/2921/2
Human preference41.3−27.5#268/3541/1
Human preference41.3−27.5#268/3541/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Jamba 1.5 Mini, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
3 publications, 11 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1240
Vals · LegalBench 66.62%Vals · CorpFin 33.88%Vals · TaxEval 41.86%Vals · MedQA 55.18%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 12.6%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 61.7%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 14%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 13.6%Enkrypt · Bias risk 87.9%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 8.9%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/jamba-1-5-mini)