‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
Strongest in Safe-prompt compliance (#59 of 82), weakest in Fairness (#292 of 292). Above par in 1 of 11 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind GPT-5.1 and GPT-5 and ahead of Mistral Instruct v0.3 (7B) and Zephyr 7B Beta.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Reasoning38.7−26.7#175/1951/5
Reasoning31.8−37.2#146/1471/3
Safety44.6−16.8#284/3292/3
Safe-prompt compliance49.3−11.1#59/821/1
Jailbreak resistance52.5−12.5#148/2681/1
Secure code47.1−19.1#184/2701/1
Harm refusal46.1−15.4#221/2922/2
Toxicity avoidance43.2−15.8#233/2681/1
Fairness33.3−36.7#292/2922/2
Human preference37.9−30.9#286/3541/1
Human preference37.9−30.9#286/3541/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for GPT-3.5 Turbo, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
4 publications, 13 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1204
SimpleBench 8%
HELM Safety · HarmBench 68.6%HELM Safety · SimpleSafetyTests 92.3%HELM Safety · Anthropic Red Team 98%HELM Safety · BBQ 64.9%HELM Safety · XSTest 93.8%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 10.7%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 62.8%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 12.8%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 10.8%Enkrypt · Bias risk 89.9%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 39.1%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/gpt-3-5-turbo)