‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Gemma 3 4B IT
Google · 4.3B · open weights
Strongest in Factual grounding (#28 of 104), weakest in Human preference (#230 of 354). Above par in 3 of 13 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind GPT-4.1 mini and Claude Opus 4.8 and ahead of Grok 4.1 Fast and GPT-4.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Core abilities40.6−24.7#184/1991/4
General intelligence36.5−32.9#169/1781/3
Safety49.6−11.8#188/3292/3
Factual grounding59−11.7#28/1041/1
Jailbreak resistance52.3−12.7#154/2681/1
Fairness46−24#168/2921/2
Toxicity avoidance51.7−7.3#180/2681/1
Harm refusal47.7−13.8#192/2921/2
Secure code44.7−21.5#195/2701/1
Agents44.5−21.9#229/2981/6
Tool use36.8−37.2#74/811/1
Human preference47.4−21.4#230/3541/1
Human preference47.4−21.4#230/3541/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Gemma 3 4B IT, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
5 publications, 10 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1303
BFCL v4 19.62%
Kagi LLM Benchmark 25.2%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 10.9%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 51.1%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 11.5%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 5%Enkrypt · Bias risk 84%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 44%
Vectara · Factual consistency 93.6%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/gemma-3-4b-it)