‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Meta · 1.2B · open weights
Strongest in Jailbreak resistance (#28 of 266), weakest in Human preference (#337 of 354). Above par in 4 of 10 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Haiku 4.5 and Phi 4 and ahead of Gemma 4 31B and DeepSeek V3.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety50.4−11#167/3271/3
Jailbreak resistance61.5−3.5#28/2661/1
Toxicity avoidance57.2−1.8#44/2661/1
Harm refusal56.1−5.4#46/2901/2
Secure code32.1−34.1#238/2681/1
Fairness38.4−31.6#274/2901/2
Agents41.8−24.5#268/2981/6
Tool use30.4−43.6#79/811/1
Human preference28.9−39.9#337/3541/1
Human preference28.9−39.9#337/3541/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Llama 3.2 1B Instruct, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
3 publications, 8 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1111
BFCL v4 10.82%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 3.2%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 8.9%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 11.7%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 1.2%Enkrypt · Bias risk 95.9%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 69.8%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/llama-3-2-1b-instruct)