‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
PowerLM 3B
IBM · 3B
Strongest in Fairness (#43 of 299, on 1 of its 2 boards), weakest in Safety (#324 of 336). Above par in 1 of 6 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude Opus 5.5 and ahead of Phi 2 and OLMo 7B Instruct Hf.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety40.4−21.1#324/3361/3
Fairness59.9−10.1#43/2991/2
Secure code39.8−26.7#221/2741/1
Jailbreak resistance26−38.9#268/2721/1
Toxicity avoidance26−33#269/2721/1
Harm refusal41.2−20.4#284/2991/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for PowerLM 3B, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
1 publication, 6 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 41.4%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 68.3%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 19.2%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 42.7%Enkrypt · Bias risk 62.5%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 54.2%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/powerlm-3b)