‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Qwen Max
Alibaba
Strongest in Toxicity avoidance (#66 of 268), weakest in Human preference (#212 of 354). Above par in 5 of 8 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Sonnet 5 and ahead of Kimi K2.5 and IBM Granite 4.0 Micro.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety53.2−8.2#90/3291/3
Toxicity avoidance56.2−2.8#66/2681/1
Jailbreak resistance57.8−7.2#70/2681/1
Secure code56.6−9.6#99/2701/1
Harm refusal52.8−8.7#112/2921/2
Fairness46.2−23.8#160/2921/2
Human preference48.8−20#212/3541/1
Human preference48.8−20#212/3541/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Qwen Max, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
2 publications, 7 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1318
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 6.3%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 32.8%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 7.7%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 1.9%Enkrypt · Bias risk 83.7%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 19.6%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/qwen-max)