‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Amazon Nova Lite
Amazon
Strongest in Factual grounding (#25 of 104), weakest in Human preference (#261 of 354). Above par in 5 of 9 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 4.8 and Claude Sonnet 5 and ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol and Kimi K2.6.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety53.7−7.7#77/3292/3
Factual grounding59.8−10.9#25/1041/1
Harm refusal56.4−5.1#42/2921/2
Jailbreak resistance56.9−8.1#82/2681/1
Toxicity avoidance52.9−6.1#152/2681/1
Secure code49−17.2#163/2701/1
Fairness45.4−24.6#182/2921/2
Human preference43.2−25.6#261/3541/1
Human preference43.2−25.6#261/3541/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Amazon Nova Lite, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
3 publications, 8 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1260
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 7%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 15.6%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 7.3%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 4.2%Enkrypt · Bias risk 85%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 35.1%
Vectara · Factual consistency 93.9%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/amazon-nova-lite)