‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Granite 3.1 2B Instruct
IBM · 2B
Strongest in Toxicity avoidance (#10 of 268), weakest in Human preference (#301 of 354). Above par in 2 of 8 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude 3 Opus and ahead of Command R and Gemma 4 12B.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety48.9−12.5#209/3291/3
Toxicity avoidance58.7−0.3#10/2681/1
Jailbreak resistance56.5−8.5#93/2681/1
Harm refusal48.9−12.6#167/2921/2
Secure code39.2−27#220/2701/1
Fairness42.3−27.7#248/2921/2
Human preference35.5−33.3#301/3541/1
Human preference35.5−33.3#301/3541/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Granite 3.1 2B Instruct, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
2 publications, 7 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1179
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 7.4%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 45%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 11.7%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 0.2%Enkrypt · Bias risk 89.7%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 55.1%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/granite-3-1-2b-instruct)