‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
QwQ 32B
Alibaba · 32B
Strongest in Toxicity avoidance (#119 of 268), weakest in Fairness (#269 of 292). Above par in 4 of 10 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Opus 4.8 and ahead of Grok 4.1 Fast and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Coding45.1−21.1#127/1791/6
Agentic coding44.6−22.3#124/1731/5
Human preference50.5−18.3#191/3541/1
Human preference50.5−18.3#191/3541/1
Safety47.9−13.5#235/3291/3
Toxicity avoidance54.5−4.5#119/2681/1
Jailbreak resistance54.7−10.3#120/2681/1
Secure code46.8−19.4#185/2701/1
Harm refusal46.4−15.1#213/2921/2
Fairness40.2−29.8#269/2921/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for QwQ 32B, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
3 publications, 8 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1336
Aider polyglot 20.9%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 8.9%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 66.1%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 7%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 3.1%Enkrypt · Bias risk 93%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 39.6%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/qwq-32b)