‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8B
Ai2 · 8B
Strongest in Jailbreak resistance (#44 of 272), weakest in Human preference (#269 of 342). Above par in 4 of 8 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Opus 4.8 and ahead of Olmo 2 32B Instruct and Command R.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety53.2−8.3#96/3371/3
Jailbreak resistance60−4.9#44/2721/1
Harm refusal55.9−5.7#55/3001/2
Toxicity avoidance56.4−2.6#64/2721/1
Secure code49.9−16.6#157/2741/1
Fairness42.7−27.3#251/3001/2
Human preference39.7−27.8#269/3421/1
Human preference39.7−27.8#269/3421/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8B, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
2 publications, 7 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1220
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 4.3%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 17.2%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 8%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 1.8%Enkrypt · Bias risk 89.2%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 33.8%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/llama-3-1-tulu-3-8b)