‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
GLM-4 9B Chat
Z.ai · 9B
Strongest in Secure code (#134 of 274), weakest in Safety (#316 of 336). Above par in 1 of 6 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude Opus 5.5 and ahead of Grok 3 and Falcon Mamba 7B Instruct.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety41.5−20#316/3361/3
Secure code52.5−14#134/2741/1
Fairness47.5−22.5#150/2991/2
Harm refusal45.2−16.4#242/2991/2
Toxicity avoidance26−33#259/2721/1
Jailbreak resistance26−38.9#261/2721/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for GLM-4 9B Chat, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
1 publication, 6 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 34%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 51.7%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 17.7%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 24.6%Enkrypt · Bias risk 81.7%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 28.4%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/glm-4-9b-chat)