‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Gemma 2 2B IT
Google · 2B
Strongest in Secure code (#27 of 270), weakest in Human preference (#288 of 354). Above par in 3 of 8 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Opus 5 and ahead of NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B and Command R.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety48.9−12.5#211/3291/3
Secure code63.2−3#27/2701/1
Fairness52.4−17.6#91/2921/2
Harm refusal51.9−9.6#124/2921/2
Jailbreak resistance35.2−29.8#230/2681/1
Toxicity avoidance35.8−23.2#245/2681/1
Human preference37.5−31.3#288/3541/1
Human preference37.5−31.3#288/3541/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Gemma 2 2B IT, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
2 publications, 7 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1200
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 25.2%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 25.6%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 14%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 15.9%Enkrypt · Bias risk 74.2%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 6.2%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/gemma-2-2b-it)