‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Jamba Large 1.7
AI21
Strongest in Factual grounding (#55 of 101), weakest in Harm refusal (#284 of 300). Above par in 2 of 9 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 5.5 and ahead of Grok 3 and Command R Plus.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Core abilities40.9−26.5#184/2041/3
General intelligence36.9−33.2#191/2041/3
Safety46.3−15.2#272/3372/3
Factual grounding50.7−19.9#55/1011/1
Fairness50.5−19.5#106/3001/2
Secure code47.7−18.8#179/2741/1
Jailbreak resistance46.8−18.1#201/2721/1
Toxicity avoidance47.3−11.7#218/2721/1
Harm refusal41.3−20.3#284/3001/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Jamba Large 1.7, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
3 publications, 8 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Kagi LLM Benchmark 26.1%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 15.5%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 53.9%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 26.8%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 8.2%Enkrypt · Bias risk 77%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 38.2%
Vectara · Factual consistency 90.3%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/jamba-large-1-7)