‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Granite 3.1 8B Instruct
IBM · 8B
Strongest in Toxicity avoidance (#16 of 266), weakest in Human preference (#285 of 354). Above par in 4 of 10 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude Sonnet 4 and ahead of MiMo V2.6 Flash and Gemini 2.5 Pro.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety51.2−10.2#149/3271/3
Toxicity avoidance58.5−0.5#16/2661/1
Jailbreak resistance59.7−5.3#52/2661/1
Harm refusal53−8.5#107/2901/2
Secure code41−25.2#206/2681/1
Fairness43.4−26.6#228/2901/2
Agents46.8−19.5#184/2981/6
Tool use42.2−31.8#57/811/1
Human preference38.3−30.5#285/3541/1
Human preference38.3−30.5#285/3541/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Granite 3.1 8B Instruct, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
3 publications, 8 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1209
BFCL v4 27.1%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 4.7%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 28.3%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 9.7%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 0.3%Enkrypt · Bias risk 88.1%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 51.6%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/granite-3-1-8b-instruct)