‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Granite 3.1 8B Instruct
IBM · 8B
Strongest in Toxicity avoidance (#17 of 272), weakest in Human preference (#273 of 342). Above par in 4 of 10 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude Sonnet 4 and ahead of Gemini 2.5 Pro and DeepSeek V3.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety51.3−10.2#152/3371/3
Toxicity avoidance58.6−0.4#17/2721/1
Jailbreak resistance59.6−5.3#53/2721/1
Harm refusal53−8.6#109/3001/2
Secure code41.1−25.4#209/2741/1
Fairness43.4−26.6#237/3001/2
Agents45.7−22.4#171/2681/5
Tool use42.2−31.8#57/811/1
Human preference38.5−29#273/3421/1
Human preference38.5−29#273/3421/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Granite 3.1 8B Instruct, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
3 publications, 8 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1208
BFCL v4 27.1%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 4.7%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 28.3%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 9.7%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 0.3%Enkrypt · Bias risk 88.1%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 51.6%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/granite-3-1-8b-instruct)