‹ PublicAI IndexGoogle
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Strongest in Safe-prompt compliance (#64 of 82), weakest in Toxicity avoidance (#228 of 272). Above par in 4 of 9 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind GPT-5.1 and GPT-5 and ahead of GPT OSS 20B and IBM Granite 4.0 Micro.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Human preference52.6−14.9#162/3421/1
Human preference52.6−14.9#162/3421/1
Safety49.6−11.9#196/3372/3
Safe-prompt compliance46.8−13.6#64/821/1
Fairness48.4−21.6#135/3002/2
Harm refusal51.2−10.4#137/3002/2
Jailbreak resistance51.4−13.5#169/2721/1
Secure code48.2−18.3#177/2741/1
Toxicity avoidance45.7−13.3#228/2721/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
3 publications, 12 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1354
HELM Safety · HarmBench 72.2%HELM Safety · SimpleSafetyTests 97.7%HELM Safety · Anthropic Red Team 99.4%HELM Safety · BBQ 92%HELM Safety · XSTest 92.7%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 11.6%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 46.1%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 8.7%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 9.3%Enkrypt · Bias risk 86.1%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 37.3%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/gemini-2-0-flash-lite)