‹ PublicAI IndexGoogle
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Strongest in Safe-prompt compliance (#63 of 82), weakest in Toxicity avoidance (#226 of 268). Above par in 4 of 9 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind GPT-5.1 and GPT-5 and ahead of Grok 3 and GPT OSS 20B.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Human preference52.3−16.5#172/3541/1
Human preference52.3−16.5#172/3541/1
Safety49.5−11.9#193/3292/3
Safe-prompt compliance46.8−13.6#63/821/1
Fairness48.4−21.6#133/2922/2
Harm refusal51.2−10.3#136/2922/2
Jailbreak resistance51.4−13.6#164/2681/1
Secure code48−18.2#176/2701/1
Toxicity avoidance45.4−13.6#226/2681/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
3 publications, 12 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1354
HELM Safety · HarmBench 72.2%HELM Safety · SimpleSafetyTests 97.7%HELM Safety · Anthropic Red Team 99.4%HELM Safety · BBQ 92%HELM Safety · XSTest 92.7%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 11.6%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 46.1%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 8.7%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 9.3%Enkrypt · Bias risk 86.1%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 37.3%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/gemini-2-0-flash-lite)