‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
H2o Danube3 4B Chat
H2O.ai · 4B
Strongest in Jailbreak resistance (#77 of 266), weakest in Safety (#277 of 327). Above par in 2 of 6 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude 3.5 Sonnet and ahead of Command R+ and SmolLM 360M Instruct.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety45.1−16.3#277/3271/3
Jailbreak resistance57.3−7.7#77/2661/1
Toxicity avoidance50.4−8.6#194/2661/1
Harm refusal47.2−14.3#199/2901/2
Secure code26.3−39.9#252/2681/1
Fairness40.2−29.8#267/2901/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for H2o Danube3 4B Chat, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
1 publication, 6 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 6.7%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 56.1%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 10.3%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 5.9%Enkrypt · Bias risk 93%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 81.8%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/h2o-danube3-4b-chat)