‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
GLM-5 Turbo
Z.ai
Strongest in Secure code (#61 of 274), weakest in Fairness (#239 of 299). Above par in 4 of 6 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude Opus 5.5 and ahead of GPT-5.6 Astra and DeepSeek Chat.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety51−10.5#159/3361/3
Secure code60.8−5.7#61/2741/1
Harm refusal51−10.6#140/2991/2
Toxicity avoidance52.4−6.6#173/2721/1
Jailbreak resistance48.9−16#185/2721/1
Fairness43.4−26.6#239/2991/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for GLM-5 Turbo, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
1 publication, 6 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 13.7%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 11.1%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 24%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 4.6%Enkrypt · Bias risk 88.1%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 11.6%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/glm-5-turbo)