‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Phi 2
Microsoft
Strongest in Fairness (#60 of 299, on 1 of its 2 boards), weakest in Safety (#328 of 336). Above par in 1 of 6 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude Opus 5.5 and ahead of Mistral Instruct v0.1 (7B) and PowerMoE 3B.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety38.7−22.8#328/3361/3
Fairness56−14#60/2991/2
Secure code31.5−35#247/2741/1
Jailbreak resistance26−38.9#263/2721/1
Toxicity avoidance26−33#270/2721/1
Harm refusal41.6−20#277/2991/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Phi 2, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
1 publication, 6 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 36.4%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 78.3%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 14.7%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 43.6%Enkrypt · Bias risk 68.5%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 71.1%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/phi-2)