‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Amazon Nova Pro
Amazon
Strongest in Factual grounding (#11 of 104), weakest in Human preference (#238 of 354). Above par in 5 of 11 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 4.8 and Claude Sonnet 5 and ahead of Grok 4.1 Fast and GLM-4.6.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety53−8.4#103/3292/3
Factual grounding62.3−8.4#11/1041/1
Harm refusal56.6−4.9#39/2921/2
Jailbreak resistance55.9−9.1#102/2681/1
Toxicity avoidance52.9−6.1#152/2681/1
Fairness45.5−24.5#178/2921/2
Secure code40.8−25.4#211/2701/1
Agents46.1−20.3#198/2981/6
Tool use40.7−33.3#64/811/1
Human preference46.1−22.7#238/3541/1
Human preference46.1−22.7#238/3541/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Amazon Nova Pro, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
4 publications, 9 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1290
BFCL v4 24.97%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 7.9%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 17.8%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 5.5%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 4.2%Enkrypt · Bias risk 84.8%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 52%
Vectara · Factual consistency 94.9%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/amazon-nova-pro)