‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Granite 4.0 H Small
IBM
Strongest in Factual grounding (#14 of 104), weakest in Human preference (#243 of 354). Above par in 6 of 9 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude 3 Opus and ahead of Kimi K2.6 and GPT-6 Sol.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety54.8−6.6#54/3272/3
Factual grounding62−8.7#14/1041/1
Toxicity avoidance58.4−0.6#17/2661/1
Harm refusal55.2−6.3#68/2901/2
Secure code54.5−11.7#117/2681/1
Jailbreak resistance53.3−11.7#139/2661/1
Fairness47.7−22.3#143/2901/2
Human preference45.8−23#243/3541/1
Human preference45.8−23#243/3541/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Granite 4.0 H Small, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
3 publications, 8 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1287
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 10.1%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 14.4%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 11.3%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 0.4%Enkrypt · Bias risk 81.4%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 24%
Vectara · Factual consistency 94.8%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/granite-4-0-h-small)