‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Granite 4.0 H Small
IBM
Strongest in Factual grounding (#14 of 101), weakest in Fairness (#147 of 299). Above par in 6 of 7 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude 3 Opus and ahead of GPT OSS 120B and GPT-5.6 Sol.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety54.9−6.6#54/3362/3
Factual grounding62−8.6#14/1011/1
Toxicity avoidance58.4−0.6#20/2721/1
Harm refusal55.2−6.4#71/2991/2
Secure code54.7−11.8#119/2741/1
Jailbreak resistance53.2−11.7#143/2721/1
Fairness47.7−22.3#147/2991/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Granite 4.0 H Small, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
2 publications, 7 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 10.1%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 14.4%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 11.3%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 0.4%Enkrypt · Bias risk 81.4%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 24%
Vectara · Factual consistency 94.8%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/granite-4-0-h-small)