‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Granite 3.2 2B Instruct
IBM · 2B
Strongest in Toxicity avoidance (#10 of 266), weakest in Secure code (#204 of 268). Above par in 2 of 6 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude 3 Opus and ahead of Granite 3.1 2B Instruct and WizardLM 2.8x22B.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety49.5−11.9#194/3271/3
Toxicity avoidance58.7−0.3#10/2661/1
Jailbreak resistance56−9#100/2661/1
Harm refusal48.6−12.9#174/2901/2
Fairness44.2−25.8#200/2901/2
Secure code42.1−24.1#204/2681/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Granite 3.2 2B Instruct, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
1 publication, 6 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 7.8%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 45%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 12.5%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 0.2%Enkrypt · Bias risk 86.8%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 49.3%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/granite-3-2-2b-instruct)