‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct
Microsoft
Strongest in Secure code (#46 of 268), weakest in Fairness (#181 of 290). Above par in 5 of 6 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Grok 4.7 and Apriel 1.5 15B Thinker and ahead of Granite 4.0 H Tiny and Qwen3.5 122B A10B.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety53.5−7.9#82/3271/3
Secure code61.8−4.4#46/2681/1
Toxicity avoidance56.5−2.5#56/2661/1
Jailbreak resistance55.6−9.4#108/2661/1
Harm refusal52.7−8.8#113/2901/2
Fairness45.4−24.6#181/2901/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
1 publication, 6 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 8.1%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 23.9%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 12.7%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 1.7%Enkrypt · Bias risk 85%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 8.9%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/phi-3-5-moe-instruct)