‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
H2o Danube3 500M Chat
H2O.ai
Strongest in Jailbreak resistance (#176 of 272), weakest in Safety (#325 of 336). Above par in 1 of 6 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude Opus 5.5 and ahead of Phi 2 and PowerMoE 3B.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety40.4−21.1#325/3361/3
Jailbreak resistance51.2−13.7#176/2721/1
Toxicity avoidance34−25#251/2721/1
Harm refusal42.6−19#271/2991/2
Secure code26−40.5#271/2741/1
Fairness40.6−29.4#275/2991/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for H2o Danube3 500M Chat, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
1 publication, 6 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 11.8%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 72.8%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 13.3%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 17.5%Enkrypt · Bias risk 92.5%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 93.3%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/h2o-danube3-500m-chat)