‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral · 24B · open weights
Strongest in Factual grounding (#11 of 104), weakest in Harm refusal (#252 of 292). Above par in 4 of 10 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind O1 and Claude 3.5 Sonnet and ahead of Kimi K2.5 and Grok 4.1 Fast.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety48.8−12.6#213/3293/3
Factual grounding62.3−8.4#11/1041/1
Safe-prompt compliance52.6−7.8#48/821/1
Fairness49.6−20.4#118/2922/2
Toxicity avoidance53.9−5.1#129/2681/1
Jailbreak resistance53.8−11.2#131/2681/1
Secure code43.8−22.4#199/2701/1
Harm refusal44.1−17.4#252/2922/2
Human preference44.6−24.2#252/3541/1
Human preference44.6−24.2#252/3541/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
4 publications, 13 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1274
HELM Safety · HarmBench 45.2%HELM Safety · SimpleSafetyTests 93.3%HELM Safety · Anthropic Red Team 96.4%HELM Safety · BBQ 93.3%HELM Safety · XSTest 95.3%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 9.6%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 54.4%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 9.3%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 3.5%Enkrypt · Bias risk 84.8%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 45.8%
Vectara · Factual consistency 94.9%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/mistral-small-3-24b-instruct)