‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Mixtral 8x7b Instruct
Mistral
Strongest in Safe-prompt compliance (#62 of 82), weakest in Safety (#294 of 331). Above par in 2 of 12 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind GPT-5.1 and GPT-5 and ahead of Jamba 1.6 Mini and Zephyr 7B Beta.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Professional39.9−23.2#174/1871/2
Medical33.8−32.7#139/1491/1
Legal35−31.4#156/1621/1
Human preference37.3−31.3#282/3461/1
Human preference37.3−31.3#282/3461/1
Safety43.9−17.5#294/3312/3
Safe-prompt compliance47.7−12.7#62/821/1
Jailbreak resistance51.4−13.6#169/2711/1
Toxicity avoidance52−7#179/2711/1
Secure code42.8−23.5#204/2731/1
Fairness44.1−25.9#214/2962/2
Harm refusal39.8−21.7#285/2962/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Mixtral 8x7b Instruct, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
4 publications, 14 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1197
Vals · LegalBench 55.84%Vals · MedQA 53.22%
HELM Safety · HarmBench 45.1%HELM Safety · SimpleSafetyTests 90.5%HELM Safety · Anthropic Red Team 92.8%HELM Safety · BBQ 85.7%HELM Safety · XSTest 93.1%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 11.6%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 61.7%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 13.3%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 4.8%Enkrypt · Bias risk 88.6%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 48%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/mixtral-8x7b-instruct)