‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Command A (03-2025)
Cohere · 111B · open weights
Strongest in Tool use (#26 of 81), weakest in Fairness (#287 of 296). Above par in 8 of 24 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind GPT-5.4 and Claude Sonnet 5 and ahead of GPT-4o mini and Claude 3.5 Haiku.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Agents52.6−13.3#74/2891/6
Tool use56.3−17.7#26/811/1
Professional47.5−15.6#122/1881/2
Legal54.6−11.3#45/1641/1
Medical48.4−18.1#98/1491/1
Finance39−23.5#142/1611/1
Knowledge43.7−19#160/1911/3
Academic knowledge34.9−29#110/1231/1
Coding39.7−26.7#166/1761/6
Agentic coding38.7−28.3#162/1691/5
Human preference52.3−16.3#168/3501/1
Human preference52.3−16.3#168/3501/1
Reasoning36.7−28.2#175/1901/5
Science30.8−32.7#110/1221/1
Mathematics35.9−28.2#134/1501/2
Core abilities41.9−23.3#197/2251/4
General intelligence38.3−30.5#192/2141/3
Safety46.1−15.3#269/3312/3
Factual grounding51.8−19#50/1021/1
Toxicity avoidance53.1−5.9#149/2711/1
Secure code49.5−16.8#159/2731/1
Jailbreak resistance51.7−13.3#161/2711/1
Harm refusal41.8−19.7#272/2961/2
Fairness36.9−33.1#287/2961/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Command A (03-2025), left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
6 publications, 19 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1354
BFCL v4 46.49%
Kagi LLM Benchmark 28.8%
Vals · CaseLaw 64.52%Vals · LegalBench 79.7%Vals · CorpFin 45.96%Vals · TaxEval 61.37%Vals · MedQA 80.55%Vals · SWE-bench Verified 7.8% (Mini-SWE-agent)Vals · GPQA Diamond 48.48%Vals · MMLU Pro 69.17%Vals · AIME 13.33%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 11.3%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 51.1%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 27.3%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 4%Enkrypt · Bias risk 98.2%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 34.2%
Vectara · Factual consistency 90.7%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/command-a-03-2025)