‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Granite Vision 4.1 4B
IBM · 4B
Strongest in Document parsing (#72 of 76), weakest in Knowledge (#186 of 190). Above par in 0 of 2 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Fable 5.1 and ahead of Qwen3.5 2B and WeVisDoc 4B.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Knowledge37.1−25.7#186/1901/3
Document parsing36.2−27.5#72/761/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Granite Vision 4.1 4B, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
1 publication, 6 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
ParseBench · Overall 39.45%ParseBench · Tables 63.81%ParseBench · Charts 47.47%ParseBench · Content faithfulness 64.43%ParseBench · Semantic formatting 21.52%ParseBench · Visual grounding 0%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/granite-vision-4-1-4b)