‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Rakedoc Nano
Other
Strongest in Knowledge (#3 of 190, on 1 of its 3 boards), weakest in Document parsing (#3 of 76). Above par in 2 of 2 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Fable 5.1 and ahead of Gemini 3 Flash and GPT-5.6 Sol.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Knowledge60.4−2.4#3/1901/3
Document parsing61.1−2.6#3/761/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Rakedoc Nano, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
1 publication, 6 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
ParseBench · Overall 77.23%ParseBench · Tables 86.44%ParseBench · Charts 64.89%ParseBench · Content faithfulness 88.84%ParseBench · Semantic formatting 71.68%ParseBench · Visual grounding 74.28%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/rakedoc-nano)