‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
KDL Frontier Parser Nano
Other
Strongest in Document parsing (#22 of 76), weakest in Knowledge (#24 of 190). Above par in 2 of 2 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Fable 5.1 and ahead of GPT-6 Sol and Qwen3.8 27B.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Knowledge57.3−5.5#24/1901/3
Document parsing57.7−6#22/761/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for KDL Frontier Parser Nano, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
1 publication, 6 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
ParseBench · Overall 72.38%ParseBench · Tables 85.73%ParseBench · Charts 58.61%ParseBench · Content faithfulness 87.75%ParseBench · Semantic formatting 55.06%ParseBench · Visual grounding 74.75%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/kdl-frontier-parser-nano)