‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
DeepSeek V2.5
DeepSeek
Strongest in Coding (#120 of 164, on 1 of its 5 boards), weakest in Human preference (#195 of 341). Above par in 0 of 4 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Opus 4.6 and ahead of GPT-4.1 Nano and GPT-4o Mini.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Coding44.3−24.8#120/1641/5
Agentic coding43.1−25.6#120/1571/4
Human preference49.6−17.9#195/3411/1
Human preference49.6−17.9#195/3411/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for DeepSeek V2.5, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
2 publications, 2 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1323
Aider polyglot 17.8%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/deepseek-v2-5)