‹ PublicAI IndexGoogle
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Gemini
Strongest in Agentic coding (#80 of 157, on 1 of its 4 boards), weakest in Reasoning (#130 of 178). Above par in 0 of 4 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Fable 5.1 and ahead of Mimo V2.5 Pro and Muse Spark.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Coding48.7−20.4#84/1641/5
Agentic coding48.4−20.3#80/1571/4
Reasoning44.7−22.2#130/1781/4
Reasoning41.4−27.7#106/1401/3
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Gemini, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
2 publications, 2 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Aider polyglot 38.2%
SimpleBench 31.1%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/gemini)