‹ PublicAI IndexGoogle
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Gemini Exp 1206
Strongest in Agentic coding (#86 of 169, on 1 of its 5 boards), weakest in Reasoning (#142 of 189). Above par in 0 of 4 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Opus 5 and ahead of GPT-5.2 Codex and Kimi K2.6.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Coding48.7−17.7#90/1761/6
Agentic coding48.5−18.5#86/1691/5
Reasoning44.6−20.2#142/1891/5
Reasoning41.3−25.4#114/1431/3
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Gemini Exp 1206, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
2 publications, 2 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Aider polyglot 38.2%
SimpleBench 31.1%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/gemini-exp-1206)