‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Trinity Large
Arcee
Strongest in Factual grounding (#30 of 104), weakest in Agents (#267 of 298). Above par in 4 of 9 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 and ahead of Gemma 4 31B and Mistral Medium 3.1.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety52.4−9#116/3291/3
Factual grounding57.7−13#30/1041/1
Professional48.4−14#118/1941/2
Legal48.8−17.1#99/1731/1
Finance46.7−15.7#114/1621/1
Human preference53.5−15.3#161/3541/1
Human preference53.5−15.3#161/3541/1
Agents41.9−24.5#267/2982/6
Knowledge work37−33.7#168/2082/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Trinity Large, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
5 publications, 6 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1367
GDPval-AA 344
AA-Briefcase 256
Vals · CaseLaw 57.88%Vals · CorpFin 54.66%
Vectara · Factual consistency 93.1%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/trinity-large)