‹ PublicAI IndexGoogle
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Gemini 2.0 Pro
Strongest in Safe-prompt compliance (#46 of 82), weakest in Harm refusal (#155 of 299). Above par in 4 of 8 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4 and ahead of Mimo V2.5 Pro and Claude 3.5 Haiku.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Coding48.1−21#86/1641/5
Agentic coding47.7−21#85/1571/4
Professional45.2−16.4#127/1681/1
Finance41.2−21.7#124/1511/1
Safety51.6−9.9#143/3361/3
Safe-prompt compliance52.8−7.6#46/821/1
Fairness55.9−14.1#61/2991/2
Harm refusal50.1−11.5#155/2991/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Gemini 2.0 Pro, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
3 publications, 8 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Aider polyglot 35.6%
Vals · CorpFin 43.44%Vals · TaxEval 68.15%
HELM Safety · HarmBench 65.3%HELM Safety · SimpleSafetyTests 97.5%HELM Safety · Anthropic Red Team 98.7%HELM Safety · BBQ 95.6%HELM Safety · XSTest 95.4%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/gemini-2-0-pro)