‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Muse Glimmer
Meta
Strongest in Human preference (#99 of 341), weakest in Agents (#152 of 267). Above par in 2 of 6 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Fable 5 and ahead of Granite 4.2 30B and DeepSeek R1.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Human preference59.3−8.2#99/3411/1
Human preference59.3−8.2#99/3411/1
Core abilities46.3−21.1#134/2041/3
General intelligence44.7−25.4#136/2041/3
Agents47−21.1#152/2672/5
Knowledge work46.1−27.5#99/1772/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Muse Glimmer, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
4 publications, 4 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1424
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 17
GDPval-AA 774
AA-Briefcase 474
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/muse-glimmer)