‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Composer 2.5
Other
Strongest in Agentic coding (#67 of 169, on 1 of its 5 boards), weakest in Coding (#72 of 176). Above par in 2 of 2 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Opus 5 and ahead of GLM-5.3 Flash and Grok 4.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Coding51.7−14.7#72/1761/6
Agentic coding51.8−15.2#67/1691/5
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Composer 2.5, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
1 publication, 2 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Vals · SWE-bench Verified 79.6% (Cursor CLI)Vals · Vibe Code Bench 49.61% (Cursor CLI)
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/composer-2-5)