‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
CodeLlama 7B Instruct Hf
Meta · 7B
Strongest in Secure code (#112 of 274), weakest in Safety (#306 of 336). Above par in 1 of 6 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude Opus 5.5 and ahead of Grok 3 and SmolLM2 360M Instruct.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety42.6−18.9#306/3361/3
Secure code56−10.5#112/2741/1
Harm refusal45.8−15.8#230/2991/2
Toxicity avoidance37.3−21.7#245/2721/1
Jailbreak resistance26.7−38.2#259/2721/1
Fairness40.1−29.9#278/2991/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for CodeLlama 7B Instruct Hf, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
1 publication, 6 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 32.5%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 26.7%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 29.5%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 15.2%Enkrypt · Bias risk 93.3%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 21.3%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/codellama-7b-instruct-hf)