‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Nova Lite
Amazon
Strongest in Factual grounding (#25 of 101), weakest in Human preference (#251 of 342). Above par in 5 of 9 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 and ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol and Kimi K2.6.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety53.8−7.7#76/3372/3
Factual grounding59.8−10.8#25/1011/1
Harm refusal56.5−5.1#41/3001/2
Jailbreak resistance56.8−8.1#86/2721/1
Toxicity avoidance53−6#155/2721/1
Secure code49.2−17.3#164/2741/1
Fairness45.4−24.6#188/3001/2
Human preference43.5−24#251/3421/1
Human preference43.5−24#251/3421/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Nova Lite, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
3 publications, 8 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1260
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 7%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 15.6%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 7.3%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 4.2%Enkrypt · Bias risk 85%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 35.1%
Vectara · Factual consistency 93.9%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/nova-lite)